HD LAB ENTRY #104: 4th Amendment

Clarity.

Allow me to clarify.
This video pissed off a home-schooled conservative moron from Kentucky who thought I should keep my focus on fat jokes. I’m guessing Obama has continued these Bush-era violations.

NY Times: Federal judge Finds NSA Wiretaps Were Illegal: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/01/us/01nsa.html

Directed by: Chris Weagel

10 Responses to “HD LAB ENTRY #104: 4th Amendment”

  1. C 02/09/2006 at 8:58 pm #

    A) I have to assume he is doing something he can’t justify because why else WOULDN’T he get a warrant? From what I have heard, he can get one up to 24 hours AFTER the wiretap. The Patriot Act can’t justify listening in to an al-qaeda conversation?

    B) who are these terrorists using landlines? VolIP people! Skype!

    C) good entry

  2. quirk 02/10/2006 at 12:10 am #

    All these “war-time measures” in a war without an end. Specious arguments proferred by the rats to appease the easily appeasable citizenry. Nobody screaming really, just the occasional whimper of “hey, um, can you guys do that?”.

    The Nation That Was Mutilated By Apathy.

  3. Jimmy 02/10/2006 at 10:59 am #

    Right on dog! Right to the point of it!

  4. missb 02/11/2006 at 5:59 pm #

    Yeah, Man!

    The 4th is what makes me walk home rather than be “randomly” searched by a cop before getting on a subway here at home. I keep a copy in my bag.

  5. Dave H 02/13/2006 at 9:58 am #

    But freedom’s on the march! Frigging communist!

  6. Levois 02/13/2006 at 7:13 pm #

    I have to get used to you getting political. ;)

  7. ronen 02/14/2006 at 3:38 am #

    Me Am Love This Video.

  8. rob parrish 02/16/2006 at 11:44 pm #

    Very direct and powerful. And sadly necessary, some people want to ignore the plain text. What a bunch of shits.

  9. Rick 04/02/2006 at 7:50 pm #

    You’re right, it is a fine line, that very often needs highlighting, between protecting the rights of citizens and protecting the citizens. I think it’s wonderful that we live in a country that allows/demands the citizenship keep a vigulance of that line. On a side note, I also find it amazing that this is the same country that vigalently defends #4, routenly tramples #2 and miss reads and abuses #1….but alas, is definately better than the alternative.
    ps. good, straight forward commentary (for someone who was obviously droped on his head as a child)

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. BartBlog - The Blog of BartCop.com » 4th Amendment - 09/13/2007

    [...] You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site. Leave aReply [...]

Leave a Reply